Judiciary Policy in the Field of Health and Social Insurance

Day-to-day power distribution and separation of powers, in addition to territorial dimensions, is also expanded into subjective and technical dimensions and is divided into smaller and smaller branches to allow for monitoring through reduced power. One of the technical and subject areas that has important policy implications is the area of ​​health and social security, which even in the most neoliberal governments has a large share of the budget and has a strong lobby and lack of judicial oversight. It can lead to bad decisions and wasted resources and opportunities. For this reason, there are usually two types of oversight in this area, one being political or public oversight that is vague and inefficient, and the other being effective and transparent judicial oversight. This type of oversight has entered the political arena since the US Supreme Court formulated the doctrine of the "political question" and rendered "democratic rights" out of the jurisdiction of the unaccountable and unrepresentative judiciary and made decisions on certain issues such as "politics". Public court, education, health, immigration and labor and the environment and ... "which was later called a policy judiciary. This research, which uses a library, descriptive and analytical approach to examine the legalization of health and social security policy, has concluded that judicialisation in this area is unprecedented and if it is in line with the constitutional criteria of a democratic society. , Leads to the development of health and social security, but not to major crashes, undermining health and further violations of rights and corruption.