Judgment Insight Criteria to Solve Two Ethical Paths of Independence and Despotism in Based on Religious Sources

Judges sometimes make the distinction between independence and despotism when deciding on a sentence that can only be distinguished by understanding its nature and criteria. All the written works in this field dealt with the judge's independence from legal, jurisprudential and political perspectives and lacked any insight into their understanding. It was possible to solve such a problem in a network of different domains. The purpose of this study is to solve these two ethical paths through a religious domain based on insight.

The research method in this study is analytical and applied based on valid library resources.

Extraction of four criteria: "correctness of attitude towards the origin of existence", "recognition of analytical capacities and emotional limitations", "real recognition of the origins of spiritual knowledge and its attachment", "consideration of assignment, formulation and developmental judgment" In addition to the judiciary, it was also essential for individual and organizational decision-making.

This study stated the criteria, indicators and instances of independence and despotism with regard to the field of vision, so that the referees in the situations faced can be able to depart from these two ethical paths.