Feyerabend; myth-making myth-makerFrom the universal critique of science and religion to pluralism and the majority vote

By exposing the shortcomings and shortcomings of science, Paul K. Feyerabend,   questions the omnipotence of it and calls for the separation of society from science, just as at one time, with the help of science itself, society was separated from the church. Feyerabend calls for the establishment of freedom and pluralism in society, and his pluralism is inspired by John Stuart Mill. The present study seeks to show that the pluralism of desire is fundamentally different from the idealistic pluralism of Feyerabend, and that the pluralism of desire is a means of discovering the truth, but for Feyerabend it is an end in which it stops and the ideal society itself - free society - Builds upon it. We also show that Feyerabend, who opposes any universal criterion and bases this on the critique of science, creates a new myth called "Majority Vote" when he wants to talk about the pros and cons of moving towards his ideal society.