Rules and Effects of Competency in Legal Actions

Some legal practices, despite the creation in the world of credit and their identification by the Shari'a and the law, do not have the present effect and until the provisions and the necessary components of their complement are annexed, they are lacking a legal effects. These actions are considered to be correct for competency. Although, they have potential for full legal action. All the irrevocable and revocable contracts and financial unilateral acts, can be recognized as correct competency and with similar concepts, "the theory of contract management" and "relative nullity" has shared points in foreign law, but it also has differences. Volition, capacity and consent are the fundamental requirements of competency as legal action. The effects of competency is different in contracts which have "Mora'a" and "Moqouf" invalidity. Incompleteness of contract may lead to the revocation or termination of the contract or, in rare cases, to be ineffective. Competency in condition contrary to the requirement of contract, assuming relinquishing this condition, leads to survival of the contract, In terms of recognizing a desirable element and main goal of the contract, which has the ability to survive without the condition. Assurance of the titles also is effected by competency based on the jurisprudential theory, but in civil cod it should be distinguished; knowing as effect of competency wherever is considered as result of a void contract and effect of authenticity in articles that is considered as result of a proper contract. In unauthorized financial unilateral acts,