A comparation of the two interpretative Sufi schools about verse of "Interpretation" (Case study: Mosannafat by Ain-ol Ghozate Hamedani and Kashf- Al asrar by Meybodi)

The main basis of the article is about some points related to the verse of interpretation based on the views of two mystical writers, Hamedani and Meybodi. These two Islamic thinkers should be considered as representatives of the two currents of interpretive thought in the second half of the fifth century and the beginning of the sixth century AH. Our general goal is to know the mystical perceptions and to explain the interpretive thoughts of mystics towards the text of the Quran. In the method of collecting information, uses library resources and then qualitatively analyzes the data by argumentative method.The resultsof the research show that thehamedani accepts firm knowledge to interpret Ambiguous verses along with divine knowledge. Although he does not claimto have achieved the interpretation ofall the Ambiguous, he implicitly refers to himself as one of the firmly grounded in knowledge. If Meybodi looks at the verse of interpretation with an interpretive and legislative view and believes that the knowledge of the interpretation of analogies belongs only to God.but it is absolutely not against interpretation. In KashfalAsrar we are faced with twointerpretations that are reprehensible and acceptable. Interpretations that deviate from the path of Shari'a, books and traditions arenot condemned, and otherwise, theyare acceptable and desirable. From the point of view of both interpretive thinkers, what should be considered as commonalities is that both of them, without any doubt, consider pure faith and submission and firm submission and belief in the heart to the Ambiguous of the Holy Qur'an.