The Validity of Forum Selection Clause in Maritime Bills of Lading

The forum selection clause in international commercial contracts, which is also known as jurisdiction clause, is an agreement based on which the parties of maritime shipment of goods choose a forum the settle the disputes arising from the contract. The incorporation of such clauses in maritime bills of lading results in granting jurisdiction to a foreign court and deprivation of jurisdiction from an internal competent court. The proceedings in a foreign court, in many cases, lead to the application of governing law on the settlement of disputes and affect the carrier’s responsibilities. On the other hands, most of the international and national rules governing on the maritime shipments of goods are mandatory and the validity of foreign forum selection clause in maritime bills of lading has been doubted because of the inconsistency with public policy. Regardless of complying with the fundamental circumstances governing on the validity of contracts in the formation of jurisdiction agreements, the courts of different countries consider some criteria for the application of such clause based on their national legal system and they may also give no effect to the forum selection clause due to the forum non convenient or evasion of the law. However, the validity of forum selection clause is currently accepted in most international agreements and national legal systems and the courts of different countries are complying with. The main theme of the present study is to examine the validity of this clause.