the validation of Dream for recognition of Divine "Hojat"

Shiite thinkers by dividing intuition into infallible intuition and tainted intuition accept infallible intuition and consider the validity of knowledge based on tained intuition conditional on conformity with the definite index . Ahmad ibn Ismail Basri, the false contemporary claimant of Mahdism is one of the opposition of this view. Basri interprets the dream as a direct divine text. his reasons for proving the authority of the dream are absolute, but he believes only in the authority of the dream. In his point of view in order to prevent falsehood circle, the arguments for the authority of a dream must necessarily be "rational."These reasons include thenecessity of identifying his caliph based on Divinewisdom, the impossibilityof makingmistakeby God, and theauthority of certaintyfor the dreamer.It is clear that by distinguishing the position of the appointment of the caliph by God with the position of introducing him to the people and also the significant difference between the meaning of phenomena and their truthfulness, the error of the mentioned view can be well shown. Also, by emphasizing human free will in choosing a source of knowledge, making mistake by God will be eliminated.also not matching the reality of all dreams compromised the certaintyof deams