Jurisprudential analysis of the grounds for the criminalization of holding the satellite equipments

The criminalization of holding the sattelite equipments is a jurisprudental challenge in the criminal policy of Islamic Republic of Iran. Various satellite applications in communications and science raise the important question whether this criminalization has a jurisprudential justification? The two categories of legal jurisprudence agreement and opposition was investigated and verified. The result was that holding the satellite equipments is not religiously prohibited, but sometimes needed. Therefore, its criminalization in general, is forbidding the Solomon of God, closing down the path of God, violating the principle of respect for people’s property and the limits of citizenship freedom, and as a result, it is forbidden. But the use of vulgar, obscence or blasphemous, and in general, illegal use of satellite technologies by seeing, hearing, reading, etc., if not causes illegimate harm or harass to another, is religiously prohibited, but not a crime, and if it causes illegimate harm or harass to another, it is both prohibited and crime, and in other cases, it is neither unlawful nor a crime. If the effects of illegal behavior is limited in the privacy of the offender, privacy is immune of criminalization.