A critical analytical study of the famous theory of jurists on the quality of tartibi ghusl

the rules of ghusl are more sensitive because due to the existence of the major impurity, the interruption in the ghusl also prevents the correctness of ablution (removes the lesser impurity). What is the quality of performing sequential ghusl in terms of arranging the washing of body parts based on valid jurisprudential evidences? How is the quality of performing tartibi ghusl in terms of the order of washing body parts in terms of body washing based on valid jurisprudential reasons? Is the popular theory more consistent with the content of the evidence or the unpopular theory? The research method is critical analysis. Is the popular theory of jurists more consistent with the content of the sources or the unpopular theory? The research method is critical analysis. After explaining the popular and less popular fatwa on the condition of the order of washing the body in ghusl, Jurisprudential sources and their meanings are examined. According to the famous fatwa of the jurists, it is necessary to perform tartibi ghusl in three stages. The whole head should be washed first, then the right side of the body thoroughly and then the left side of the body thoroughly and disruption in this way is detrimental to the correctness of ghusl. Their reason is consensus is narrated fatwa reputation, some hadiths, and the principle is precaution. These reasons can be criticized from different angles based on the contents presented in this article. Based on the application of some hadiths and also with the impairment of citing narrations, consensus and fame and the principle of innocence as a condition of redundancy, the popular theory is that it is sufficient to wash the body after the head and the necessity of arranging between the right and left sides of the body is stronger.