Titus Burckhardt's epistemological basis for Islamic art and critique of Oleg Grabar's attitude

One of the serious questions in the field of Islamic art is whether Islamic art is an art without mystery, secular, decorative, and only the art of Muslims and Islamic lands that have been influenced by other lands, and the term Islamic art is just a label to divide. And is the distinction between Muslim art and the art of other lands considered, or is Islamic art a cryptic, meaningful, legal and interpretable art that derives from the epistemology, ontology and cosmology of Islam? Titus Burckhardt believes that despite the fact that Muslims have taken art from other neighboring civilizations in form, technique, and style, they have taken possession of that form and style and turned it into a new art based on epistemology. And have made their own mental geometry. In this regard, Burckhardt's thought stands in the way of those art historians such as Grabar, who consider Islamic art to be merely the art of Muslims and without any particular Islamic aspect or character. Burckhardt believes that the teachings of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) led to the establishment and formation of Islamic civilization and Muslims have contributed to the development and completion of this civilization and based on the Qur'anic and prophetic teachings, have formed art that is compatible with Islamic teachings and limited to thought and Lived Muslims.