Compatibility of the rules of a closely held corporation and a medical profession (Using the findings of comparative law)

Compatibility the rules governing a joint stock company and a medical company is not easy; can’t be accepted all the rules of a closely held corporation as the best tool of modern capitalism to performance medical profession. There is concerns about for the compliance of the rules of such a company in all stages of the company's existence, which is the formation, life and end and in relation to all the characteristics of medicine, including non-commercialism, independence and special scientific competence and the result that's mean, the patient's conscious trust. Nevertheless, fortunately optimal compatibility is possible in the light of proper benefit of rules of companies of persons and results of comparative law. Patient trust is gift of physician's duty to perform exclusively and effectively in the company and unlimited liability of partner and company. Physician independence is enhanced by apply restrictions in attracting a partner, acceptance of the rule "Each partner, one vote" and the right to withdraw the partner. Manage all partners, prohibit the manager from interfering in the profession and strengthen the majorities improves the situation. Equality of different bringers it leads to the denial of business in medicine: an approach that is reinforced by the limitation of attracting external capital an approach that is reinforced by the limitation of attracting external capital. In terms of vital services, the subject of the company's activity which is achieved thanks to the special scientific competence of physicians requires that causes of invalidity and dissolution are reduced and remove the regressive effect. However, medical the possibility of life in "Small shell of a special joint stock company" Finds and it benefits from its advantages, especially the Independent legal personality.