Legal jurisprudential analysis of obtaining the right of proxy in defense of unjust claims

One of the important issues that is seriously raised in legal circles and courts is the correctness or incorrectness of obtaining the right of attorneys, in case of defending the unjust claim from the perspective of jurisprudence and law. What has been examined in the present paper is whether the power of attorney is legitimate in defending the false claim and the right of attorney arising from it? Imami jurists agree on its sanctity. With this explanation, in jurisprudence and law, it can be respected from several perspectives - both in terms of power of attorney and in terms of power of attorney. This research has dealt with this issue based on the analytical-descriptive method and after expressing the opinions and explaining the opinions of the jurists, it was concluded that accepting a power of attorney to defend a false claim and obtaining a power of attorney is forbidden; Because the obvious example is the possession of property in vain and the protection of sin. Therefore, it is appropriate for the legislator to impose a legal prohibition in this regard by enacting a single definite article, and the law should be approved in accordance with the issue.