Critique and classification of the views of critics of Shamloo poetry and thought

 Shamloo"s works and ideas, as a new poet and master of style and format in contemporary Persian literature, have a relatively wide range and familiarity with the critiques of his poetry and thought, interest Critics and critics help people with a broader vision and a more principled approach to criticism. In this article, the articles of the last two decades on the subject of criticism and analysis of poetry and thought, which have been published in scientific-research journals, as well as the index books that have criticized and analysis of poetry and thought, have been reviewed and classified. This classification determines from which perspectives Shamloo poetry can be researched and from which perspectives it has remained unknown and neglected. The present article has tried to answer the question, which type of critique has been the most approached by critics in the last two decades, and what is the reason for the abundance or quantity of types of critique of Shamloo"s poetry and thought?

 For this purpose, sixty-four scientific and research articles published in prestigious journals in the eighties and nineties and thirty-seven index books in the field of poetry including poetry using descriptive-analytical method and data collection as The library has been reviewed.

 In the field of articles, the amount of criticism in the nineties is twice as much as the criticism in the eighties. Of the twenty-eight articles in the eighties, eight were rhetorical critiques, four were deconstructive critiques, and the rest were mythological, psychoanalytic, and feminist critiques. In the nineties, forty-three scholarly essays have critiqued poetry and inclusive thought, with the highest proportions being comparative, rhetorical, constructivist, and reader-centered, respectively. In the field of critical books, the most critical approaches that have been welcomed by experts and researchers in this field are: integrated criticism (frequency 27%), sociological criticism (frequency 24.32%), constructivist criticism (frequency 18.92%), Aesthetic Criticism (frequency 16.22%).

 The frequency of comparative, rhetorical, structuralist and structural criticism in the critiques of the last two decades shows that critics follow the latest approaches to criticism in the world and based on the new view of the world of criticism. On the other hand, there are many modern aspects in Shamloo"s poetry and the rhetoric of his poetry is western and new and is more in line with modern literary theories and has caused the exponential tendency of critics to his poetry.