A Feasibility Study into the Finding a Jurisprudential School of Thought from the Thought of Shaykh al-Mu’asis

The study of the jurisprudential school of thought is a secondary study and sub-chapter of the philosophy of jurisprudence in which re-reading and analysis of jurisprudential movements with regard to elements such as: systematization, tendency, basics, methods and theories are discussed. Based on this, can the jurisprudential thought of Shaykh al-Mu’asis be considered as a school of thought? A contextual and capacity-based study of the jurisprudential thought of Āyatollāh Shaykh ‘Abd al-Karīm al-Hā’irī, to measure the degree of adaptation of these elements with a descriptive, explanatory, and historical method, shows that systematization means regulation, connection and a different arrangement of content and parts is not visible in his jurisprudence. However, there are trends, bases, methods and specific theories of jurisprudence that have their roots in the time and context of the formation of the jurisprudence of Muḥaqqiq al-Hā’irī in Najaf and Sāmarrā’, which has led to a distinctive cautiousness, rationality, and axial moderation. Thus, Āyatollāh Borūjerdī’s opinion on this jurisprudential thought, the authority of his famous students in the later periods, and the transfer of this legacy to the next generations, along with the phenomenon of the Islamic Revolution in Iran has been prepared the conditions for the formation, maturity and expansion of the late Qom School of Thought, which at least the jurisprudence of Shaykh al-Mu’asis is one of the most important reasons for its appearance. Keywords: