The Role of Generational Approaches in the Validity of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Different generational approaches (from intergenerational agreement to intergenerational rupture and collapse) are studied and analyzed in "generational sociology". In law and political science, crediting or discrediting the law and legal political system has been proposed in the form of a range of opinions and ideas. In explaining the relationship between these two areas, the question arises, how different generational approaches relate to the process of validating or invalidating the existing Iranian constitutional order? In fact, if generational sociological data confirms the occurrence of a generation gap in Iran, is it possible to revalidate the existing constitution by citing the legal right to self-determination? The following article has examined this relationship as an interdisciplinary study and with a descriptive analytical method. Using trans- generational objects in sociology and pre-constitutional arguments on the one hand and extra-constitutional reasoning on the other, the paper explains the existence of a conflicting relationship between these two categories.