Defects and misunderstanding of the system of issuing permission for holding assemblings in the administrative law of Iran

Generally , countries base their assemblings on two systems, "precautionary" and "preventive." In the precautionary system, governments restrict the holding of assemblings with conditions (such as prior announcement or prior permission). In the persecution system, the principle is freedom, and citizens can hold assemblings without restrictions. Government intervention begins when demonstrators do not comply with the legal limits set for the protection of public order and other social considerations (including non-harm to the rights of others). In the present study, an attempt has been made to investigate the system of issuing permits for holding assemblings in the administrative law of Iran in order to identify the Defects in front of it. The result indicates that in Iran, many Defects and misunderstanding in the issuance of permission for holding assemblings can be traced. Therefore, the system of prudence and governance must take steps to eliminate them. These measures include cited; The need to pass a comprehensive law on public order, to provide a transparent procedure for permission by the Constitutional Court and the Court of Administrative Justice, to determine specific places for holding assemblings, to develop political parties and associations, and to review and reform the composition of permissing members.