Comparison of the theory of the discrepancy of the mind with the promise of the ghost and its results

The mismatch between the mind and the outside is one of the challenges that many sages do not accept, and most sages may agree that what one perceives is true. Conversely, if the theory of mind-object mismatch is put forward, it may be equated with a ghost statement, while this theory can be analyzed differently in such a way that neither a ghost statement is necessary nor a sophistry arises. In this study, which is based on the library method of collecting information, analyzing it and comparing opinions, the conformity between object and mind is rejected because there is no reason for conformity, but there are narrative and empirical (intuitive) arguments for non-conformity. In connection with the inconsistency arises in the following discussion of the promise to respond to the ghost. One of the fruits of this theory is that it solves the problems that exist in revelation, dream interpretation, and the embodiment of bodily deeds and resurrection, because in these cases, different interpretations of a truth have been expressed, which if the mind and the object are compatible with each other. They are contradictory and unsolvable, but when the conformity between mind and object is removed, different interpretations of a truth can be given.