Interpretive Approach that Reflected in the Traditions of those accused to exaggeration

In the advanced religious sources, Shia narrators who lived in the first four centuries of Hijri have been accused of exaggeration. The theme of some of their narrations is the interpretation of the Holy Qur'an quoted by the Shia imams (pbuh). His interpretative narrations can be recovered among various hadith works. The Shiite scholars have not attributed Ghol to all these personalities. However, it should be assumed that sometimes these narrators are accused of exaggeration as a result of the themes they have narrated. Perhaps part of the themes that caused these narrators to be accused of exaggeration are the ones that are reflected in their narratives. In order to test this possibility, we must find out whether they have a common approach in interpreting the Qur'an by reviewing the exegetical traditions passed down from these accused of exaggeration. And if there is such a shared approach, can it distinguish their interpretation method from the general attitudes of Shiites or not? The present study, as the first step of investigating this issue, is an attempt to answer the first question. For this purpose, by accepting the basis that the items of each narrator are the result of his selectiveness and represent his insights, by reviewing the interpretative narratives of those accused of exaggeration, we will try to find out which types of understanding of the text they have reflected in their interpretation, and among them, which types of representation and reflection It is wider. In this study, the hypothesis is to be defended that the interpretation bases of those accused of exaggeration are not significantly different from the attitudes of other advanced Shia scholars; But it is possible to find a significant relationship between the tendency to exaggeration and the use of some interpretation techniques mentioned by Wensbro.