The relationship between the government and criminal populism in the context of judicial criminal policy with an emphasis on murder cases

populism was first mentioned in political science, but the populist movements of the officials of the criminal justice system regarding the increase in crimes and... caused attention to the will of the people and public opinion in criminal policies, hence The statesmen, considering the ineffectiveness of correction and treatment models against the crime rate and the very high cost of these approaches, and the economic crisis of the governments and the increasing demand of the people in the field of providing security and comfort, caused the emergence of populist criminal policies, hence in this The research seeks to examine the relationship between the government and criminal populism and its consequences in criminal justice policy.

The present research was carried out using a descriptive and analytical method.

The findings of the research indicate that factors such as: public fear and concern about crime, exaggerated media representation of crimes and weakening of welfare states have played a role in the formation of extra-systemic platforms for the emergence of criminal populism policy by governments. and factors such as managerialism in the criminal justice system and the introduction of election slogans in criminal politics are also involved in the formation of the intra-system platforms of governments. Also, the results of the research indicate that haste in proceedings, non-compliance with the principle of equality of arms, non-compliance with the principle of judicial independence and non-compliance with the principle of judicial impartiality are the most important consequences