Jurisprudential foundations of media terror criminalization and its punishment

In today's media world, it is one of the major social issues in jurisprudence. Therefore, its umbrella has spread over all subjects and has covered and affected everything from religion, culture, art to economic, welfare, political, security, etc. issues.
With this statement, during the extensive activities of the media, the real or legal personality may suffer as a result of media attacks, which is an example of war and terror. In this case, the main point in terror is to create terror, lawlessness, violence and lack of rules, which can be seen abundantly on radio, television, cinema and cyberspace, and the result is to change people's behavior. Now the question arises, where is the position of jurisprudence and its foundations in confronting the assassination of real and legal personalities? It is assumed that according to religious ideas, support of society, guarantee of public order and protection of individual rights, a punishment is considered for the wrongdoers and perpetrators of media crimes, and the guarantor of the damages is specified and the method of compensation is stated. . The jurisprudential foundations clearly show the customary and Sharia responsibility of the media. To reach this hypothesis, a descriptive-analytical method has been used. The purpose of this research is to formulate comprehensive laws based on the existing facts in this field.