Constructivist analysis of crimes against government lands

Drawing the concept of "crime" is the starting point of the path of criminal thought. In fact, the image of crime presents other fundamental concepts of criminology (such as criminality and etiology) and the system of criminal policy (such as justice, criminology, and prevention). According to the theory of social constructivism, crime can be considered a social phenomenon that is not outside the human mind and has an independent objective existence, so what is considered a crime will vary depending on who describes it. Was; Therefore, in interpersonal relationships, we are faced with constructing a social reality of crime.This article takes a mediocre view of social constructivism from the concept of crime and uses the theory of "social reality of crime", which believes that the application of criminal law and the definition of criminal behavior and the development of appropriate behavioral patterns and the construction of criminal perception, product It is the action of shareholders who try to secure their personal and group interests by influencing the criminalization process. The reality of the criminalization process in the field of state lands in Iran has been discussed and analyzed. The study of the formal discourse of criminal policy actors using descriptive-analytical research method and detailed discussions of the National Assembly and the Islamic Consultative Assembly has shown that at least in the field of land crime in the Iranian criminal justice system, constructivist theory on the criminal process and the mentality of its actors It clearly rules.