Comparative analysis of our general sale in Iranian jurisprudence and law

There are many differences between jurists and legal scholars regarding the rulings of our general sale in the form of a contract, so the main purpose of this article is to express the views of jurists regarding the general sale of our form of a contract and to reconcile with the opinion of the jurists.                                

This is a descriptive-analytical article and the subject has been examined using the library method. 

Ethical considerations:

 In this article, the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness are respecte.                        

Many jurists have rejected the ownership of the general sale and, following some laws of other countries, point to the contractual nature of the general sale contract and excluded it from the scope of the ownership contract. Therefore, they believe that the time of transfer of ownership is generally the time of assigning or handing over goods. 

Meanwhile, the Imami jurists have proved the ownership of the general sale according to the evidence, and regarding the time of transfer of ownership in the general sale, they believe that the time of the conclusion of the sale. The civil law has also used the opinions of jurists in some legal articles and has considered the time of transfer of ownership in the general sale as the time of the contract and indicates that it is possessive.