Criminalization of Informed False Statement in Iranian Law

Judicial justice is one of the biggest goals of any judicial system, which has been raised as a value in legal systems. The concern of Islam is also evident in the implementation of justice and the establishment of justice based on Sharia standards in this field. On the one hand, the implementation of judicial justice requires the participation of citizens in providing timely and correct information about the occurrence of a crime, and on the other hand, it requires accurate and fast actions of the judicial system. Any action that delays the discovery of the crime and the identification of the accused and leads to the misleading of the judges handling the case and the escape of the accused from the clutches of justice, or leads to the reduction of their role in the occurrence of the crime, or makes innocent people into suspects. to accuse, it will put the execution of justice in a halo of ambiguity, and finally the order and security and public interests of the society will be under threat. Finally, in this research, using the descriptive and analytical method, it is concluded that false statements, in addition to bad consequences in the process of handling cases and delaying the proceedings, cause people's skepticism towards the judicial system, Iran's legislator except in cases Especially due to the lack of an independent chapter with the name of crimes against judicial justice, special attention has not been paid to the crime of informed false statements as a crime against judicial justice, and the need for a new look at the criminalization of false statements in line with the implementation of judicial justice.