Review and evaluation of two models and minimal and maximal models for the presence of jurisprudence and ethics In dramatic works

Undoubtedly, any work of art that wants to take the title of Islam must be compatible with the framework of jurisprudence and ethics, and it is necessary to respect the privacy and patterns of jurisprudence and ethics in it, but the question before us is to what extent should He remained faithful to these two theological concepts, and under what conditions, by not respecting the territory and limits of those two categories, a dramatic work loses its religious and Islamic ability, or in other words, its religious legitimacy in production, display and viewing. In a dramatic work, is the narrative and the story the main point of gravity, and should the story be based on religious and Islamic ideas, and if the story is against religious beliefs or morals, does the work lose its religious title? Or that the format and form of narration and story is emphasized, and beyond the story, attention should be paid to the aspects of the formation and appearance of dramatic works, in which case, jurisprudence and religious customs should be taken into account in its construction and production, and in the acting and presentation of the artwork. gave This article seeks to examine the position of each of those two previous concepts based on the presentation of two models and models in dramatic works and based on theorizing in this field, the amount of attention to jurisprudence in dramatic works in the format and form of illustration. first model) and pay attention to ethics and beliefs in the content of stories and narratives (second model) to explain and evaluate.