The inadequacy of state laws in America and the need for International Environmental legislation to be synchronized with relation to Cloud Seeding and the creation of the Climate Change Agency

Cloud seeding has been used in many countries in recent decades to combat drought, reduce pollution, and mitigate global warming, among other things. Local and state laws govern the process in the United States. Due to differences in state laws, the broad extent of the land covered each time has perplexed seeders, affected people, and courts of law. Due to the sheer lack of federal laws and inconsistencies in state laws, those affected by the negative effects are legally helpless, while the offenders escape punishment. This research seeks to answer the following questions: “How well do existing laws meet current legal needs in this regard?” and “Is there a way to eliminate the potential shortcoming?” A descriptive-analytical approach is used to investigate issues arising from the lack of a federal law and the state jurisdiction of current laws. The goal is to demonstrate the inadequacy of existing laws and the need for comprehensive federal legislation. Giving the benefits and drawbacks of federal law regulation, presenting solutions to eliminate the drawbacks, and demonstrating the ineffectiveness of general responsibility laws, the benefits of developing such a law that governs state laws outweigh the drawbacks. The inadequacy of current laws in terms of their enforcement serves as further evidence of the necessity of establishing an organization to control, manage, and monitor cloud seeding.