Comparative study of language from Derrida's and Mulla Sadra's point of view; A platform for explaining the possibility or impossibility of deconstructive reading of the Quranic text

"Language" element and related issues are one of the most challenging aspects of philosophy and new critical approaches in reading religious texts. This issue is doubly important in postmodern critical approaches and especially the Derridian reading of texts, which is one of the tools of some neo-Mu'tzalites in reading the Qur'anic text due to the authenticity of the language in these approaches, and it has caused great challenges due to the difference in the way of looking at the language. It comes from. In this regard, the present research aims to "explain" two different views from the perspective of Derrida and Mulla Sadra in order to provide the conditions for the visibility of two approaches to being and knowledge through the window of language and the extent of the possibility of such readings with an analytical-comparative method. to check. The findings of the research show that according to Mulla Sadra's view of existence, knowledge, and language, and his belief in the system of formation and education, which is derived from three sources of knowledge, the intellect, the heart, and revelation, and the divine language has three creative stages. Considering the formative and legislative and considers human language to be sub-territorial, Derrida's view on the third linguistic level can be examined from this point of view, and due to Derrida's failure to proceed from the intellectual-philosophical method, he never from the "verb" stage (in the epistemic system of creation and Amr) has not gone higher.