A Ranking of Urban Districts of Sari City in Livability Indices

The purpose of this study is to investigate the viability of Sari city and its neighborhoods and also the general assessment of the city in terms of urban viability (in four dimensions of urban viability, namely social, economic, viability and physical). The method used in this research to collect data are two methods documentary and field. The data collection process was done through a questionnaire tool and in order to analyze the information obtained from the questionnaire, a one-sample t-test was used. Findings shows in the social index, only the item of satisfaction with neighbors with an average of 3.37 and Sig = 0.000 had the highest satisfaction among respondents and it can be said with certainty that among the component of relations with neighbors, the highest satisfaction It is about satisfaction with neighborly relations. The study of environmental index and items related to facilities and equipment of Sari shows that among the items surveyed, only satisfaction with the gas network is acceptable and citizens with an average of 3.25 at a significant level of 0.035 Sig = their average satisfaction with Urban gas supply system have expressed. In the study of visual quality component, all items show that citizens are low satisfaction with urban design and map, vitality of neighbourhoods and visual beauty of the city and neighborhood, therefore that the average of all of them is reported to be about 2.5, which indicates a general weakness. It is in this component. Examining the various items related to the components of the economic index shows that there is a consensus among the respondents about the livelihood component in all items that they are not moderately satisfied with any item and we face a low level of satisfaction in all aspects of living. Overall, it can be concluded that among all the main components of bioavailability, in the social index of the sense of belonging to the city of Sari in the bioenvironmental index of green space and urban facilities and equipment, in the economic index of housing status among other components at a significant level 99% are above average.