Interpreting the dialogue of laws from Leo Strauss’ point of view based on his interpretation of Al-Farabi's Talkhis -e-Nawamis

Republic and Statesman demonstrate the limitations of the city in distinct yet comparable ways. The first work reveals the impossibility of philosophers ruling, while the second work proves the necessity of the rule of law. Consequently, both dialogues establish foundations for addressing the question of the ideal political order based on its compatibility with the city's nature. However, formulating the best principles for the city falls within the domain of laws. This particular work held significant importance for Leo Strauss, which can be viewed from two perspectives. Firstly, Strauss' last work, "Argument and Action in Plato's Laws," focuses on the study of "Platonic Political Philosophy" and explores the tension between philosophy and politics through the final resolution of the problem. It represents the culmination and complete expression of theological-political thought. Secondly, in the introduction to "What is Political Philosophy," Strauss considers Laws to be Plato's most political work, if not the only one, as it features the Athenian stranger, along with his companions, describing a set of rules for an imminent city establishment. In contrast, Socrates constructs a city in the Republic solely through words and not in practice. Understanding how Strauss interprets Plato's Laws is of paramount importance. To comprehend his approach, we must first become acquainted with his elucidation of Farabi's interpretation of Talkhis-e-Navamis then, delve into his own interpretation to uncover similar motivations.