The concept and types of competence of the review authorities and the type of competence of the authorities in the cooperative sector with regard to the influential geographical components

Jurisdiction, according to the law, means the authority and duty that the legislator gives to the judicial authority to handle a lawsuit. Knowing the types of jurisdiction of the court is important, because by knowing each type of jurisdiction, the related rules can be well analyzed and different effects can be imposed on each of them. The authority of authorities is in three categories: intrinsic, relative and local. Inherent competence is the exclusive competence of a judicial or non-judicial authority in dealing with matters or lawsuits announced by the legislator. The rules related to inherent competence are among the mandatory rules and an agreement contrary to it is not possible. The competence related to the union and the cooperative chamber is of the type of inherent competence, because the judicial and administrative authorities of each are of a separate class with their own coordinates and characteristics and are inherently different from each other, and their competence is inherent to specific claims. In relation to relative jurisdiction, considering that the issue of relative jurisdiction is raised when both supreme and supreme authorities have the same nature and gender, i.e. both authorities must be judicial or both authorities must be non-judicial in order to be able to He established two relative competences in a special sense. Therefore, the issue of relative jurisdiction in arbitration authorities is ruled out. Regarding the local jurisdiction, which is the same jurisdiction as the jurisdiction of the court or the arbitration authority, it seems that going directly to the court and removing jurisdiction from the arbitration authority if there is an arbitration agreement is contrary to articles 10 of the Civil Code and 6, 454 and 472 of the civil procedure law.