IDENTITY ON MODERN AND RADICAL COSTRUCTIVISM

How configurating of identity and its existentiality between modern and radical constructivists would be surveyed in this written.modern is indicted to essencialism and accepting the prior identity for agents by radical constructivists due to emphasize on structuration theory and some givens of scientific realism. Moreover paying no attention to relation discourse and disregarding power role on it, modern Twofoldism of self/other, existing of two intellectual actors at "first date"- which self knows other before interaction- accreting the meaning of sign, ability to draw a casual relation between special action and fixed mind of identity as a variable in casual indicating, are some of the other censures which were discussed by radical constructivists. They instead emphasize on fluidity of identity, remark to paraphrasing rather than explanation and instruction, no distinguishing meaningly between self/other and impossibility of meaning utility and clarity of pose and importance of power and matter- its position in interactional discourses. This written additional to mentioned censures criticize modern constructivism as follows: despite importance of identity I understanding behavior, finding the changes in identity from surveying the changes of behavior is impossible.