Claim of Being Aware or Unaware in Deception

Author(s):
Abstract:
Deception claims insist on evident difference between the real price and the contractual price. Being the majority of "Option of Deception" claims, these claims are in contradiction to the agreement of both sides in a contract and thus the defendant usually refuses to undertake the charge of deception. The claim can be made after a long time and such a claim may cause great loss to the other side. The plaintiff should not be aware of the real price at the time of contract; otherwise, the claim cannot be legally justified. The jurists disagree whether the plaintiff is supposed to be aware of the price or can justify his claim by being unaware; a disagreement which is also reflected in the judiciary system. The point is that which side of the contract is the defendant and which side is the plaintiff. According to jurisprudential texts, in all claims of deception the side which claims to be deceived is the plaintiff, whether being an expert or not. However, supporters of the opposite side are considerable in number.
Language:
Persian
Published:
Fiqh - e - Ahl - e - Bait, Volume:16 Issue: 63, 2010
Page:
155
magiran.com/p872312  
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یک‌ساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال می‌توانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
  • حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران می‌شود.
  • پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانه‌های چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمی‌دهد.
In order to view content subscription is required

Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!