نشریه سخن تاریخ
پیاپی 32 (پاییز و زمستان 1399)

Dalaelgraphy of Nabavi (PBUH) examines books that focus specifically on the signs of the prophethood of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as evidence for his prophethood. The way these writers deal with the prophetic signs of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) shows what components of the Prophet's biography are of interest to them in this genre, and this is largely based on the theological or hadith school. These authors are done. The first work of Ismaili thinkers on this subject is the book by Abu Hatem Razi (322 AH).The present study seeks to answer the question that Abu Hatam Razi, as a prominent Ismaili theologian, has paid attention to which components of prophetic reasoning and whether he is different from other non-Ismaili writers in this regard or not? The answer obtained shows that the Ismaili views on prophetic reasoning were not significantly different from the authors of other schools, including muhaddithin, Zaidi theologians, Mu'tazilites, and Ash'arites. The importance and necessity of this research lies in the fact that the book of Abu Hatem Razi was the oldest Ismaili work on the subject and so far no research has been done on this subject.

After the establishment of the Ghaznavid government in 351 AH, the kings of this government attacked different parts of India in order to expand their territory and to gain political legitimacy and economic benefits. The scope and intensity of these attacks expanded especially during the reign of Sultan Mahmud. This research, using a descriptive-analytical method and based on library sources, seeks to answer what repercussions the attacks of Sultan Mahmud had on the sources of this era. According to the findings of this study, the poetic and prose works of the Ghaznavid era, though highlighting the economic dimensions of those conquests, by addressing issues such as ruining Hindu temples and constructing mosques instead, teaching Islamic principles, sending portions of trophies to the center of the Islamic Caliphate, and also allocating some portions to Sadat, religious motives of Sultan Mahmud has been said to be the main reason behind those conquests.

AThe dynasty of Lor Atabakan the Greats (Atabakan-e-Lor-e-Bozorg) is one of the local dynasties of Iran in the period between 550 and 827 AH. This dynasty went through various crises during its rule. One of the most important issues that greatly affected the life of this dynasty was its relations with the two governments of Bani Abbas and the Ilkhans. The present article intends to investigate this issue according to the documents through a descriptive analytical method. Lor Atabakan the Great, like other local dynasties, established relations with the Abbasid caliphs seeking political legitimacy from the very first days of their regime. In analyzing the relations of Atabakan with the Mongol Ilkhans, what seems to be important is Atabak's involvement and presence in the succession disputes after Abaqa Khan. During their regime, the Atabaks had conflicts with local dynasty such as Al-Zafar and Atabakan Lor Kuchak.