نشریه محیط شناسی راهبردی جمهوری اسلامی ایران
سال هفتم شماره 3 (پیاپی 24، پاییز 1402)

The military strategy of any country is prepared and adjusted in accordance with the policies, doctrines and defense policy. Preparation and formulation of military strategy is the most important task of the military organization, which is presented in every country by the highest military authority of that country. The US military presence and influence in the West Asian region has always been one of the topics that has been given special attention in the regional strategies of the US, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is also at the center of these strategies. Accurate knowledge of military strategies is essential for countermeasures, threat repelling and surprise prevention. From this point of view, the present article seeks to answer the question of what is the US military strategy in the West Asian region in the era of Trump and Biden in relation to Iran, and what are the differences and similarities of these strategies? This research is of an applied type and its method is descriptive-analytical, and written and virtual sources have been used to collect information.The findings of the research show that the US military strategy against Iran during Trump's presidency was competitive deterrence, and during Biden's presidency, it was to create integrated and cooperative deterrence with the aim of controlling the Islamic Republic of Iran.

In the hybrid battle, as a new type of battles, multiple tools and methods are used in combination with each other in order to create ambiguity and strategic attack. Especially since the focal elements in such a battle are the media and especially social networks. For this reason, it is very important to have powerful media and the ability to manage and guide public opinion in the context of this battleIn addition, the strategic prerequisite in hybrid battles is the ability and effective media and virtual governance. The scope of this capability has a high position in order to solve the problem of managing and directing public opinion and with the aim of media defense and deterrence. Therefore, the main goal of this research is to investigate the needs of public opinion management in the hybrid battle. Therefore, the main question of the research is formulated as follows: "What are the political requirements of public opinion management in the hybrid battle?";In this regard, the document analysis method has been used to advance the research and the phishing tool from various sources has been used to collect data. Based on the findings of the research, exercising governance over the virtual space, having a coherent and up-to-date media strategy and roadmap, rebuilding the authority of the national media, increasing the competitiveness of native social networks and so on. It is among the policy requirements aimed at managing public opinion in the age of combined battles

Over the past two decades, despite the partisan changes in the executive branch of the United States between Democrats and Republicans, we have seen some principles and foundations in American foreign policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The question of this article is whether the change of governments of the United States causes a change in its foreign policy towards the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The findings of this research show that with the change of governments in the United States, the president plays a role in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. After that, the political system of the United States gradually overcomes the role of the president, and the foreign policy of the United States continues as usual. Then, government institutions put all-round support for the Zionist regime on their agenda and made the peace process in the Middle East more difficult by granting various aid. Also, to legitimize the Zionist regime, these institutions have followed the process of normalizing the relations of this regime with the Arab countries with all seriousness. This research is based on the qualitative method of studying documents and texts published by governments, international organizations, UN specialized agencies, and think tanks.

the Islamic Republic of Iran needs a strategic planning for the application of soft power in foreign relations, and one of the requirements of soft power policy at the regional and international level is the correct recognition of the soft sources of power reproduction, rather than focusing on domestic potentials. provided the bases for increasing influence on national interests in the strategic environment. One of the platforms for knowing the sources of power is national and foreign documents. Since these documents are compiled and communicated according to the capacities, opportunities and threats facing the system, studying the clauses and principles of the above-mentioned documents can provide the model of power sources to the policy makers. Among the national documents of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the statement of the second step as a national document, strategic map and collective action plan has the appropriate capacity to identify and outline the multifaceted pattern of Iran's soft power sources in West Asia and the Islamic world, and considering the emphasis of the document The second step on the issue of national honor in foreign relations and demarcation with international political units, it is necessary to pay special attention to the category of soft power as one of the means of promoting national honor. Inevitably, the present article, by applying the multifaceted model of power sources and using the method of quantitative content analysis, examines the soft power sources in the aforementioned statement, and the author's effort will be to answer this question: what are the soft power sources of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the statement of the second step of the revolution? Dimensions and components?

International cooperation in cyberspace refers to participation in defined processes in international and regional organizations active in the field of cyberspace, as well as participation in bilateral, multilateral and international documents and treaties related to this space. Special conditions of Islamic republic of IRAN It has created requirements for the country's international cooperation in the cyber space. It is necessary to determine the strategies and requirements precisely so that the national interests can be realized as much as possible by participation and attendance in the assemblies and avoid the possible harms of participation in international documents and agreements. The current "developmental-applied" research on the indicators and requirements of international cooperation of Islamic republic of IRAN It has been discussed in the cyber space. Accordingly, in the current research, the theoretical foundations were analyzed and the effective factors were calculated using the foundation data theorizing method. Then, the hypotheses were evaluated and corrected through an analytical questionnaire and a focal interview. A questionnaire was prepared based on the Likert scale and after its validation, it had good reliability with Cronbach's alpha of 0.812. Then, using structural equation modeling in SmartPLS software, the data obtained from the questionnaire and partial least square analysis, the overall fit of the model is equal to 0.579, and since it is greater than 0.36, we evaluate the fit of the model as strong.

The present research, which was conducted with a qualitative approach and descriptive analytical method, seeks to answer the question that; How is the evaluation of Al-Aqsa storm operation based on the principles of the military doctrine of the Zionist regime? The author of the article, by studying the documents and examining the documents of the study centers and interviews of the leading analysts of the world and even the experts of the Zionist regime, while presenting a picture of the military capability of the Zionist regime and the statistics of the principles of the military doctrine of the Zionist regime, has come to the conclusion that the Zionist regime in all 4 principles The military doctrine itself (deterrence, early warning, military decision-making and civil defense) has failed. Also, regarding the future of war and the challenge of fleeing to the Zionist regime, it has been concluded that the Al-Aqsa storm operation showed that the military power of the Zionist regime is fake and does not have the ability to deter jihadist groups and resistance fighters. Therefore, the Zionist regime has entered into a destructive and erosive war in the Gaza Strip without calculating and thinking about the end of the war.