نشریه شبهه پژوهی مطالعات قرآنی
پیاپی 1 (پاییز و زمستان 1398)

Since Allah Almighty sought to guide humanity by sending the Prophet Khatam, the religion of Islam and the Holy Qur'an, so throughout history many oppositionists opposed this divine religion for the sake of their own interests and in order to keep people away from Islam. They used to make a lot of doubts, one of them being "genius revelation" (the Prophet (PBUH) was able to provide such material because of his great intelligence), while God according to the verses of the Holy Quran, the Prophet of Islam (PBUH) Therefore, the atonement of the Holy Qur'an is one of the most important issues that have always been taken into consideration. Therefore, we have studied the history and the pseudonym of the Orientalists and rejected their viewpoints by referring to the verses and views of the Shiite Muslim scholars and subsequently recognizing the divine origin of the "Qur'anic revelation". It's a library.

One of the important stories of the Holy Quran is the story of the creation of Adam (AS) and Eve and their eating of the fruit of the forbidden tree. In the verses related to this story, the question arises that according to the twenty-first verse of Surah Taha, the rebellion of Adam (AS) is of what kind and is it in conflict with the status of the infallibility of the prophets? Many scholars with different approaches for and against the issue of the infallibility of the prophets have expressed their views on the verse. In this study, after criticizing the views of the opponents of the infallibility of the prophets and proving the inadequacy of the rational reasons of those in favor of this issue, using rational reasoning as a deterrent to choosing the meaning of sin and error for the word "rebellion", meaning ignoring the guidance. It is defined as the only possible meaning and serious meaning of God of this word. The narrations related to the verse have also explained the quality of assigning this meaning as a confirmation of the selected opinion in the research

Opponents of the divine legitimacy of the Imamate and religious leadership, along with other arguments, have cited some Qur'anic arguments, which can be analyzed and examined in three main reasons with different explanations; Imamate as one of the public rights (haqqunnaas) is one of the reasons for this view, which is documented in the following four Qur'anic themes: judicial and legal speeches to the general public, the standing of the people in justice as a philosophy of mission and prophecy, the separation of divine prophecy from the rule of the people and the mission of the prophets. The second reason for this view is to legitimize the opinion of the people in the Qur'an, which is based on four categories of verses, including verses of consultation and advice (shoora), verses of allegiance, verses documenting the authority of consensus, and verses of obedience to the leaders (ulu’l amr). The third reason for this view is the orthographic difference between the Qur'anic concept of "rule" and its customary political meaning. Analysis and study of these evidences by the method of inference and recitation of the Qur'an would show their incompleteness in proving the claimed results.