نشریه قرآن پژوهی حسنا
پیاپی 3 (زمستان 1388)

God's Speech and Book,Quran, not only is divine revelation, but also it is meaningful and comprehensible. The prerequisite knowledge to comprehend Quran is Quranic sciences that has been the focus of Quranic Islamic scholars in the historical ages. The criterionof issues and matters of Quranic sciences are as follows; Quran's divine revelation, gradual descent, writing, Quran's history, the order of the verses, the category of the verses, Explicit, Implicit, the structure of the Surahs, the knowledge of the commentary, the causes of the descent, Quran 's linguistics, interpretation, and. abrogation

It is predicated to Medina verses in the Mecca surahs and Mecca verses in the Medina surahs so-called, "exceptional verses". Initially, studying exceptional verses was considered in Mecca and Medina traditions and occasionally in the order of descent of traditions, then,at the beginning of surahs in the commentary books, abrogating or abrogated and the number of verses, after that, in an independent aspect in Quranic science's books which included a chapter in these books on Mecca and Medina discussion, and in recent centuries in Quranic history's books and eventually it allocated monographs toitself in the modern age. However, exceptional verses in general or in detail are not consensus and there are different beliefs about the. possibility of existence of above-mentioned verses

This research is discussed, categorized, and reported Quran and commentarie's approach about first woman and Adam's wife, Eve. Three parts of Eve's life are expressed in Quran. In each verses have been referred to the existence and the presence of thiswoman, besides the story of Adam. Therefore, with the criterion of Shiite commentaries, we referred to the two important groups of commentaries, i.e. Shiite and Sunni, in order to express the difference between points of views as well as the foundation and the reason of each commentator's approach. This process indicated that themost of modern commentators have had a new approach toward Quranic stories and women beyond traditional and declarative opinions of previous commentators. Also, some commentators have interpreted and explained verses in accordance with theirperiod's conditions and viewpoints, so that occasionally their.

A lot of itmes of call prayer (Adhan) and the recitation before prayer (Iqamah) are similar to each other in the Shiite and Sunni religion. There is just a few differences in that. So, we are seeking to resolve them in this research. Tradition extracted in Sunni Islamic jurisprudents’ books are implying both on divine revelation of call to prayer and nondivinerevelation of it. But, the dissection of call to prayer are expressed completely divine revelation in the Shiite resources. All of the Shiite Islamic jurisprudents in obedience to Ahlul- Bayt (AS) believe that call to prayer has been begun with God’s dissection and the divine revelation’s descent on the prophet Mohammad (SA). In the Shiite (twelvers) religion has been represented two approaches about “I bear witness that Ali (AS) isthe Friend of Allah”, as follows; someone considers it as a recommended part. For instance, supplication during prayer in a specific manner (qanut) which is as a part of prayer and is desirable too. Also, the other one considers it recommended without being as a part call to prayer. Both of tradition indicate that bearing witness to the uniqueness of God, His prophet mission, and Ali (AS) Islamic jurisprudential guardianship don’t separate with each other and there is a bound between them. The reason that Shiite Islamic jurisprudents do permissible the triple witness without being as apart is, according to some traditions independently, when you bear witness to Ali (AS) Islamic jurisprudential guardianship. Since these traditions are independent not dependent, also, they will include call to prayer, whether in call to prayer and in the recitationbefore prayer or in none of them.