جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « سفینه تبریز » در نشریات گروه « ادبیات و زبان ها »

Amālī of Amin al-Din Haji Bola in Safīna-yi Tabrīz contains a large number of fahlavi poems. This article seeks to examine two of the fahlavi specimens in this treatise. The first fahlavi consists of three bayts (couplets) and the second one is in two bayts. The author offers a close reading of each bayt based on linguistic evidence from Iranian languages and dialects.

A part of the Al -bayaz va Al -savad the compilation of khwaja Abul Hasan Ali ibn Hasan of Sirjan is available in Safina-ye Tabriz. It is the scantling of a condensation of Al-bayaz va Al-savad and mostly includes its short utterances (sayings, words). The remaining study showed that Abul majd Mohammad ibn Masoud of Tabriz, Safina’s scribe, has been committed (made) some errata and errors. The writing mistakes of his manuscript can be classified in some categories: structural differences and unequalled in titles, error of Quran’s verses, Hadith’s error, announces’ error, omitting in the text, increasing to the text, drawing on the text, lack of attention in the meaning of the word.

The Purpose of writing this article is to investigate the specific manuscript Kholasatolashaar one of the Safineh Tabriz section, collected by Abolmajd Mohammad ibn Masoud, To study Presence of Poetesses in the history of Persian literature. This anthology is valuable Source same as Nozhatolmajales. I have Compare these two anthology to introduce former Poetesses from the earliest time of Persian literature.

A very precious collection containing 209 works, written both in verse and prose, both long and short, compiled and written in 720 to 723 (lunar year) by Abo-l-Majd Mohammad-Ibne-Masood-e-Tabrizi, one of the scholars of Tabriz, has been recently possessed by Islamic Parliament and fortunately a facsimile edition of that was published after a short time, and could, in this way, delight the scholars and researchers. Some of the works in this collection were not acknowledged at all in recent years, and some others were known, but sometimes this edition seems to be more reliable and more accurate There are also some works in this collection which are not attributed to those who have been considered the author of those works until now. In this essay, the writer describes this collection first, and then discusses about "Gol-o-Mol Dialogue" (one of the eleven dialogues of this collection) which is attributed to "Seraj-e-Ghomri", the gifted poet of seventh century, and inspects whether the attribution of this collection to "Ghomri" is correct or not.