The Shortcoming of Civil Procedure Law in Respect of the Arbitration Expertise Order
Author(s):
Abstract:
The expertise order is of interlocutory orders that an arbitrator would make during the arbitral proceeding, when the subject is being technical. The legislator has dealt with this subject only in Article 476 of the Civil Procedure Law. This Article only provides the possibility of appointing an expert by the arbitral tribunal. It does not provide further details such as the possibility of appointing experts by the parties, experts’ knowledge and the costs and expenses of the expertise. Therefore, in this paper, while expressing the above mentioned shortcomings, we answer the following questions: should the parties be able to appoint the expert? Should the appointed expert have certain qualities such as impartiality and independence? What principles of procedure should be considered with respect to expertise order? In what manner should be the costs and expenses of expertise shall be shared or paid by the parties?
Keywords:
Language:
Persian
Published:
Private Law, Volume:10 Issue: 22, 2013
Pages:
33 to 58
magiran.com/p1274334
دانلود و مطالعه متن این مقاله با یکی از روشهای زیر امکان پذیر است:
اشتراک شخصی
با عضویت و پرداخت آنلاین حق اشتراک یکساله به مبلغ 1,390,000ريال میتوانید 70 عنوان مطلب دانلود کنید!
اشتراک سازمانی
به کتابخانه دانشگاه یا محل کار خود پیشنهاد کنید تا اشتراک سازمانی این پایگاه را برای دسترسی نامحدود همه کاربران به متن مطالب تهیه نمایند!
توجه!
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.
In order to view content subscription is required
Personal subscription
Subscribe magiran.com for 70 € euros via PayPal and download 70 articles during a year.
Organization subscription
Please contact us to subscribe your university or library for unlimited access!