challenges of electronic publishing in Iran

The purpose of this study was to investigate the challenges of electronic publishing in Iran. Nowadays, electronic publishing is expanding in world. So many articles about the benefits of this type of publication has been compared with traditional publishing and Disadvantages and challenges that we have neglected Some environmental factors, such as technology, culture, politics, economics and even personality profiles and au¬diences of anthropology and education can be challenging and undeniably important to the continued success and development of electronic publishing for publishers and authors to create. In this research, an applied research - development and survey and Delphi technique is based on the views of the Assembly of Experts. Research question is: What are the challenges facing electronic publishing in Iran? And the research hy¬pothesis is that factors such as author, publisher, publication costs, distribution, singer, storage and retrieval, speed of publication and publication format. The headlines are challenging for this type of publication. The method was then that the 11-member Assembly of Experts Publications of directors consisting of three persons, 4 employees of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance 2 managers of public libraries, And an editor and an author of several popular books, With brainstorming and challenging perceived factors suggested by members Then these were coded using the Ground¬ed Theory And the final classification was extracted concepts and components And a questionnaire was developed accordingly, Then proceed to distribute the question¬naire scoring was written in Delphi This cycle was over two times Up to 80% with a standard deviation of acceptable solutions, each corresponding to the After summa¬rizing the data The database (It was over in 2310), Given the challenges of electronic publishing are classified in ten groups And most important Challenges related to the group of writers and readers Some of its components include: No standard format, Lack of scientific, literary and moral standards of judgment, Rights of authors and cre¬ators, Access problems, Issues of information retrieval, The challenge of validation and confidence building. . Finally, at the end of the study findings and conclusions based on and offers practical solutions the comparisons do.