Comparison of Theoretical Solutions and Experimental Results of Gains Allocation in Cooperative Games

The wide range of Individual choices are formed in the context of cooperative games and team working. Division of gains raised from such coalition is very important. Considering that the general framework of gains allocation in this game is different from non-cooperative games، there are variety of solutions in game theory have been proposed for this purpose. The goal of this paper، first، is a comparison of this solution with the answers that obtained from an experimental survey، and secondly، the evaluation of level of fairness in this theoretical solution concepts based on perception of those surveyed about fairness. The findings of this study suggest that “nucleolus” and “egalitarian” solutions have the most similarity to individual’s choices. Moreover،respectively، «nucleolus»، «egalitarian» and «Shapley value» solutions considered fair solutions from the perspective of Interviewees.