Comparative comparison of Ibn Arabi and Ghazali's Hermeneutics

The Scared Texts are the most valuable source for recognizing Islamic rules and knowledge; however, there is disagreement over the way these texts are understood in between Scholars where each group has looked at them from their own special standing point as the mystical interpretation deals with esoteric and spiritual aspects of the Divine Texts and discovery of secrets and references. This means that mystics, with perspectives different from others have come to realize the proper understanding of the texts through the inward and have sought to realize through interpretation. The present research deals with investigation and comparison of the Ahmad Ghazali and Ibn Arabi's styles based on rules and criteria of interpretation. These philosophers deal with the issue of "understanding" with emphasis on "understanding texts" within their most focal point of their discussions. The issues raised by them involve huge qualification that could fall effective in the mechanisms and ways of the Muslims neothinkers. In this respect, can we state that there is a difference or a similarity between the views of Ghazali and those of Ibn Arabi? Consequence of the research in some points implies a unity of interpretational style between Ghazali and Ibn Arabi and some sort of hermeneutic modality. In some cases, there are ways in which the Ahmad Ghazali's perspectives are unique of him. Mirzaye Qomi as one of the great " Osuliyun " based on the same basis of canonists were not optimistic about philosophy and tightly take the cavil to them. He has deal with practical mysticism amd associated withfamous mystics of his time; and he counts " spirituality " and " pure monotheism " the culmination of the evolution of mystical and summary and deep extracts and wondrous and wonder of pure Islam.