Review the arguments of theologians in proving of God being

Prove the being of God, philosophers have considered the issue. Several arguments have been presented in the context of its creation arguments can be cited. This argument, which is used mainly by theologians, the occurrence where by occurs when an object needs to be cause is known. Theologians claim that this argument is that any reason why it needs to happen is that he will not step you. It may also occur if the reason he would need another reason. The third reason is if you like the first and the second thing happened, he would need another reason... Since the sequence of causes is impossible, the chain of events ultimately leads to a cause that does not happen again and that it is old and does not record is not that way. This article explains the pleadings speakers to express their problems against critique of Ibn Sina, Mulla Sadra, Mollahadi Sabzwari and Allameh Tabatabai arguments about the deals and the end result is the occurrence of the argument in terms of Allameh Tabatabai based on the ink, the ink back and accept that accidents and natural occurrence, function and essence if it is proven that both fixed and variable if it is, it would be too variable, argument creation argument would be beneficial and win.