critical evaluation of academic literary articles from ideological hegemonies and methodology view

With the growth of academic journals and literary studies in recent years, pathological approaches in explaining the shortcomings of this research has taken place. But it seems that most of these studies have focused on the description of the effect and not cause and effect approach
This paper studies the academic literature are studied at three levels: the first level is understanding the nature of the ideological hegemonies in persian literary studies and their impact on literary research in academic Journald. the thought patterns of the literary studies consider an educational, descriptive and tast postition to it. . The second level to the "Methods" in the university's research and apply literary theories as the "scientific method" to literature study according to transdisciplinary approaches, theoretical pluralism, look postparadigmatic state and centrifugal exposure to this theory questions, and in the third level components of a research article with the concepts of hermeneutic methodology and is considered problematization. The components that It seems are considered most stereotypical and unnecessary .