Bringing an action versus the Islamic state and governor and jurisdiction of trial court over it

In disputes between the Muslim governor and state with the citizens, apart from the issue of initiating an action versus the ruler and government, there is this question that who is competent for its trial? Can this ruler hear the case which himself is one part of it? Similarly, there is this question that does the Islamic ruler or state require to raise an action in order to receive the public rights or , as thought by others, according to his absolute guardianship, can the governor carry it out without resorting to any judicial strategy?
In this paper, with a glance at the admissibility of bringing an action versus a governor, absolute majority of Shiite jurists`s viewpoint have been confirmed: in those cases that the Islamic Governor or judge is one of the parties, it should be resorted to arbitration of a third person. In the other hand, by raising an action against state which its personality has no reality except abstraction, there is a question that can it bring an action against a legal person?
In this article, in addition to a positive answer to the mentioned questions, it was stated that there are some probabilities regarding the types of relationship between natural person of a governor and legal person of a state, and the nature of initiating proceedings was explained as each case appropriates.