A critique of Dr. Dehir Siaqi's methodology for correcting Manouchehri's case

So far, several corrections have been made to the Manouchehri Damghani court in Iran and abroad. Among these corrections, Dr. Mohammad Dehbir Sayaqi's correction is the most well-known and most reputable proof of the Manouchehri court. But this correction also has many drawbacks. The foregoing article, as its title suggests, is a critique of the way that the moderates have made a correction to the Manuchehri di Damghani court. In this critique, four categories are considered: 1. Selection, introduction and use of the edition; 2. Text correction method; 3. Edits that have been made in subsequent printing; 4. Selection of the main and additional bits of Manouchehri. At the same time as reviewing these four categories, the bits of the Court have also been rectified. In these corrections, other handwritings of this publication are often used in other handwritings, some of which are older than the handwritings used by Doctor Depression, and others are more authentic.