Criteria of Judicial Control on Discretionary Powers In Iran, France, and Germany Law

Judicial control of discretionary Power in administrative law applying in minimum Scale. this does not mean a lack of any judicial control on these powers. usually in the process of controlling such powers, courts in different legal systems have of a number of principles and criteria for assessing the legality of the decisions that had been taken in the framework of their jurisdiction. the most important examples of the criteria is proportionality, equality, bias rule, good faith, transparency, stating the reasons and act upon policy. In this paper, we study with a comparative approach judicial control on discretionary powers in in Iran, France, and Germany law. The basic assumption of this article is based on the belief that while the judicial control of discretionary powers faced with problems. but the criteria mentioned can be help the administrative judges to assess the legality of administrative acts.