Safety, Health and Environmental Risk Management of Future Bank Building Project

Health, safety and environmental risk management in construction projects has always been a concern because of the risk nature of the work. In this study, we attempted to manage the risk management process of the future bank central building project using William Fine, JSA, PFMEA and EFMEA methods for health, safety and environmental hazards, respectively. SPSS software was used for frequency analysis of risks by type and level of risk. The results showed that of the 43 risks identified in the health sector by William Fine technique, 56% were at high level, 28% at moderate level and 16% at low level, most of which were ergonomic hazards. In the safety sector, JSA techniques identified a total of 41 hazards for 21 jobs, 40% at critical level, 51% at warning level, and 7% at low level. According to the PFMEA method, out of the 28 identified risks, 50% were at the top level, 43% at the critical level and 7% at the warning level. In total, the two techniques included risk of falling from a height and falling equipment and materials from a height. They prioritized risk. Also in the environmental field with EFMEA technique approach out of 31 identified risks, 94% were unacceptable and 6% were in acceptable area where risk of noise pollution and emission of microbes had the highest risk priority. In general, it can be concluded that safety risks are more important than other risks in the construction industry in terms of frequency, likelihood and severity of consequences.