Comparative Research in the Field of Philosophy of Education: An Emphasis on Examples in Iran

The main purpose of this study was to determine the injuries harms of comparative studies research in the field of philosophy of education, an emphasis on research examples in Iran. For achieving this aim, the analytical method (conceptual, documental, and comparative) has been used. I argued that comparative studies in the philosophy of education categorized into three categories in relevance to the nature of comparative studies, the researcher, and the comparative situation. The challenges of the nature of comparison are related to the familiarity comparative approach and method, language, and sources. The problems with the second one are acceleration, simplifying simplification, intolerance. And the challenges of the comparative situation are ignorance of time and place and culture.