Assessment from structural component of articles in criticism Arabic journal, Shahid Beheshti University

Well-developed and valid review of published papers in journals seems to be an indispensible part of scientific journey and it certainly contributes to novelty in paper writing. In this line, a questionnaire verified by humanity and cultural studies research gate was used to critically review the content of 63 Arabic literal critiques. Research findings show that lectures from 1389-1394 at structural components have increased greatly. But in 1394&95 decreased and then in 1396&97 structural components increased appreciably. Conformity considering of lectures structure whit desired standards in scientific-analyzing lectures shows that article structure at question part ̦history̦ research procedure and reason of selecting that ̦ quality of collection and analysis of analyzing matters and result don̛ t conform with scientific-analyzing article standards. Research result indicates that authors did n̛ t have coherent structural model. And article structure have adjusted on the base of what they have been trained. This foible can be corresponded with inattention to structural standards in academic teaching. Furthermore̦ not to specify a structural comprehensive model of scientific-analyzing article from editors and referees ̦also has highlighted this problem. Therefore ̦this studying has suggested a structural component of scientific-analyzing articles in Arabic language and literature.