Challenges in application of narrationlogy in academic studies of Iran (Case Study: Gremas's action pattern)

Theoretical and applied researches, on challenges, critical thinking, intimidation, and precise, methodological and scientific methods are critical in criticizing and evaluating the factors involved in constructing and developing literary texts, aesthetic analysis of literature, and the promotion of two process creation and literary research. Challenges can begin with the depth of the position of abstract concepts, and to the point where the position of objective concepts comes and rests with the retrogression of literature and philosophy. The narrative and narrative theory is about two decades that has led to academic research in Iran, especially among younger researchers, sometimes out of deep-rooted, unbridled, unwittingly and unconsciously. one of the symptoms of narrative semantics is action pattern, which is connected with the analysis of the validity of classical and contemporary texts. Implicability, methodology, leveling, theorizing, theorizing, mechanical modeling, acceleration, paperwork, fascination with the theorist, rating Promotionist, volunteers, and some of the most up-to-date advocates of this kind have been dominant in a number of narrative studies and in the form of actor Germaz. In this article, with a critical look, 23 papers were randomly selected, selected in the context of the narrative approach and the Gremas's action pattern, and the pathology of this approach, and in this theory, and in practice. The aesthetics and critical thinking in the analysis of literary texts, scholar the narrative translates into the reality of this approach within the framework of narrative genres, narrative systems and the close-up structure of the narrative and the Gremas's action pattern.