Developments of commitment in favor of third parties in the modern law of Western systems and Iranian law

Contrary to the view that the obligation in favor of a third party is an exception to the principle of relativity of the contract, today in different legal systems it is considered that such a view is not acceptable and the transnational documents of the contracts are regulated accordingly. Some Iranian jurists have considered the obligation in favor of a third party as an exception to this principle. In Iranian law, insufficient attention has been paid to the method of expression of jurists who have expressed this argument in an example. In Imami jurisprudence and consequently in Iranian law, in general, the acquisition of a benefit, including the benefit of a person and an object in favor of a third party, as well as the acquisition of an object to a third party and the obligation to own an object to a third party and an agreement in favor of a third party. Property subject to litigation in favor of a third party or payment of a third debt and obligation to pay alimony to a third party or to pay usury to a third party is also valid as an obligation to the deed, or abandonment of the deed for the benefit of a third party. It is in the interest of a third party. The obligation to conclude and the obligation to abandon the contract and create a right or abrogate the right in favor of a third party and the expulsion of a third religion.